Opinion
Beyond the agreement paradigm: Regulating algorithmic collusion under the Competition Act, 2002
Antitrust laws presume a meeting of minds. Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 prohibits any agreement causing an appreciable adverse effect on competitio ...
See more of our coverage in your search results.Encuentra más de nuestra cobertura en los resultados de búsqueda. Add The New York Times on GoogleAgrega The New York Times en Google This week I ...
RealPage Inc. agrees to a major settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve allegations that its rent-pricing software facilitated illegal “algorithmic collusion” among landlords.
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...
In yet another attempt to stretch antitrust law into new territory, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) released a joint statement of interest related to whether ...
DOJ’s acting head of criminal antitrust enforcement recently warned that companies and individuals who reach collusive agreements using algorithmic pricing tools can be subject to criminal antitrust ...
US regulatory bodies, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, have raised concerns about the potential for algorithms to facilitate price collusion among businesses, even ...
With new technology comes new possibilities. A side effect is where these possibilities fit into existing law. Dynamic, or algorithmic, pricing is a strategy where artificial intelligence uses data ...
Sara Fish’s research focuses on topics at the intersection of economics and artificial intelligence. Join her at BKC as she shares emerging research on Large Language Models (LLMs), and their promises ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results